Saturday, July 31, 2021

Gereformeerde Onderwys - Wêreldbeskouing


In hierdie tweede uitgawe in die reeks, wil ons kyk na wêreldbeskouing as 'n motivering vir Gereformeerde Onderwys.

Wat is ‘n wêreldbeskouing?

In ons vorige artikel het ons gesien dat ons Gereformeerde leer onlosmaaklik deel is van ons daaglikse lewe. Daardie leer syfer daarom deur na ons onderwys toe. Dit vorm ook die basis vir die kind se wêreldbeskouing. Die vraag ontstaan dan, wat is ‘n wêreldbeskouing, en is dit enigsins belangrik?

Eenvoudig gestel, is ‘n wêreldbeskouing die manier waarop ‘n mens die lewe en die wêreld rondom hom sien en ervaar – die sogenaamde bril en perspektief waarna ons na die lewe kyk. Dit is ‘n stel basiese beginsels waarop die manier hoe die persoon die lewe sien en ervaar gebaseer is. Dit is ‘n raamwerk wat die mens help om sin te maak van wat rondom hom aangaan.

Omdat jou wêreldbeskouing ‘n stel beginsels is, beïnvloed dit  hoe jy op alles reageer: van jou teologie en filosofie, tot jou wetenskap en kuns. Voorbeelde van wêreldbeskouings is bv. postmodernisme, humanisme, pragmatisme en die verskillende ander gelowe.

‘n Gereformeerde wêreldbeskouing word gebou op die Woord van God, soos uiteengesit in die belydenisskrifte en die Drie Formuliere van Eenheid. ‘n Lidmaat van ‘n gereformeerde kerk behoort dus ‘n gereformeerde wêreldbeskouing te hê.



Verskillende wêreldbeskouings?

As ons sê dat ‘n wêreldbeskouing die manier is waarop ons die lewe sien en ervaar, besef mens dadelik dat verskillende mense verskillende  wêreldbeskouings het – ons ervaar dit ook daagliks. Mens kan bloot na die kommentaar op sosiale media kyk om dit te ervaar: vir enige standpunt wat gestel word (en soms vir bloot onskuldige opmerkings) sal heftige argumente vír of téén daardie standpunt gelewer word, en daardie argumente sal telkens uit bepaalde wêreldbeskouings voortvloei.

As ons egter na die Bybel kyk, sien ons daar is net twee maniere om na die lewe te kyk: ons sien dit óf soos God dit sien, óf soos die Satan dit sien. Die vader van die leuen wil ons wys maak dat daar verskillende maniere is om die lewe te sien, en dat almal ewe geldig is. Die Bybel leer ons egter anders - ons lees bv. die volgende woorde in 2 Tim 3:14-17: “Maar jy, bly by wat jy geleer het en wat jy vas glo. Jy weet tog wie jou leermeesters was en jy ken van kleins af die heilige Skrif. Dit kan jou die kennis bybring wat tot verlossing lei deur die geloof in Christus Jesus. Die hele Skrif is deur God geïnspireer en het groot waarde om in die waarheid te onderrig, dwaling te bestry, verkeerdhede reg te stel en ‘n regte lewenswyse te kweek, sodat die man wat in diens van God staan, volkome voorberei en toegerus sal wees vir elke goeie werk.” (AFR83). Die Bybel, as onfeilbare woord van God, is die enigste manier hoe ons ‘n regte lewenswyse kweek, en hoe ons voorbereid sal wees vir elke goeie werk.

Daarom, as iemand nie ‘n Christelike wêreldbeskouing huldig nie, handhaaf hy noodwendig ‘n nie-Christelike wêreldbeskouing. Dieselfde geld vir ons skole – as die vakinhoud nie vanuit ‘n Christelike wêreldbeskouing opgestel is nie, is dit uit ‘n nie-Christelike beskouing opgestel. Die vraag is dan: mag ouers hulle verbondskinders aan so ‘n  nie-Christelike wêreldbeskouing  blootstel?




Wêreldbeskouing in praktyk

Hoe lyk ‘n wêreldbeskouing in praktyk? As ‘n persoon ‘n postmodernistiese wêreldbeskouing handhaaf, is hy van mening dat daar geen absolute waarheid is nie, aangesien elke mens die realiteit anders ervaar. Wat ek dus as waar sien, verskil van wat jy as waar sien, maar nie een van ons is verkeerd nie. ‘n Humanistiese wêreldbeskouing plaas die mens in die middelpunt, en beweeg weg van enige godsbegrip, maar maak eerder staat op die mense se vermoë en wetenskap om sin te maak van die lewe en hoe alles ontstaan het.

‘n Christelike wêreldbeskouing plaas God en sy woord, daarteenoor, in die middelpunt. Ons lees in Ps 119:105 “U woord is ‘n lamp vir my voet en ‘n lig vir my pad.” (AFR33/53) en in Kol 2:8 “Pasop dat niemand julle meevoer deur ‘n filosofie en leë bedrieëry, wat gegrond is op menslike tradisie en teorieë oor die kosmiese elemente, en nie op Christus nie.” (AFR2020).

God en sy Woord word in die middelpunt gestel – dit is die beginsel waarop die Christelike lewe gebou moet wees. Ons sien hoe ‘n Christelike wêreldbeskouing prakties uitgeleef word baie mooi vir ons geskets in die lewe van Daniël.

In Daniël 1 lees ons dat Daniel een van die Joodse jongmanne uit ‘n vername familie was, van die eerstes wat in ballingskap weggevoer is, en dat hy, soos die ander jongmanne, mooi, toegerus met kennis, verstandig en bekwaam was. Ons kan ons indink dat Daniël bloedjonk was toe hy meer as 800km weggevoer is na ‘n vreemde land – hy het vir meer as 60 jaar daarna diens gedoen in die koninklike paleise, en ook dat hy waarskynlik baie bang en verward was. Hy het waarskynlik geleef toe die profeet Jeremia die volk gewaarsku het, en het dus geweet dat die Here sy oordeel voltrek. Wanneer hy as jongman in Babilon aankom, word hy gekonfronteer met ‘n koning wat hom en sy landgenote probeer verander op drie ingrypende maniere:

  • Hulle denke word verander deur hulle ‘n Galdese opvoeding te gee;
  • Hul lojaliteit word verander deur vir hulle nuwe name (wat verband hou met die plaaslike afgode) te gee; en
  • Hul lewenstyl word verander deur vir hulle ‘n nuwe dieet te gee. 

Daniël en sy vriende het egter gebly by wat hulle geleer het en wat hulle vas glo (sien die verwysing na 2 Tim 3 hierbo) ten opsigte van selfs iets wat vir ons so onbenullig kan lyk soos die kos wat hulle eet. Hulle het egter die voorskrifte van die Here in Levitikus 11 in die middelpunt gestel, en daardie fondament gebruik as die bril waardeur hulle besluit wat hulle sal eet en wat hulle nie sal eet nie.

Ons lees dan verder bv. in Daniël 6 hoe hy jare later weer eens voor ‘n keuse gestel word, toe Koning Darius bevel gegee het dat niemand vir ‘n periode van 30 dae tot enige ander persoon of God mag bid, as tot hom, Darius, nie. Waarskynlik gedagtig aan die Here se opdrag in Deut 6:4: “Luister Israel, die Here is ons God, Hy is die enigste Here” (AFR83) en in Eks 20:4-5 “Jy mag nie vir jou ‘n beeld of enige afbeelding maak van wat in die hemel daarbo of op die aarde hieronder of in die water onder die aarde is nie. Jy mag hulle nie vereer of dien nie, want Ek, die Here jou God, eis onverdeelde trou aan My.” (AFR83), vorm die Here en sy Woord weer die beginsel waarop Daniël se optrede berus.

Ons kan weet dat Daniël se wêreldbeskouing gevestig is as kind, voordat hy in ballingskap weggevoer is – en dit wys hoe belangrik die regte fondasie vir ons kinders vandag is. Deur die Here se genade kon Daniël, en geslagte mense daarna, voortbou op die fondasie wat in hulle jeug gevestig is. Ons belowe tydens die doop van ons kinders om vir hulle hierdie selfde fondasie en wêreldbeskouing te leer, en na ons vermoë te laat leer.




Wêreldbeskouing en skole

Dit is daarom so belangrik dat verbondskinders van jongs af die korrekte wêreldbeskouing geleer word. Soos hierbo aangedui bepaal ons lewensbeskouing hoe ons die fisiese wetenskappe, geskiedenis, lewens wetenskappe, sosiale wetenskappe en selfs kuns benader. As ons glo dat die Bybel die onfeilbare Woord van God is, dan bepaal die Bybel hoe ons oor al hierdie vakrigtings dink. Dan moet heelwat van die onderliggende filosofie waarmee meeste skoolvakke vandag aangebied word, afgewys word. Ons beplan om in toekomstige artikels meer aandag te gee aan hoe ‘n gereformeerde wêreldbeskouing na vore kom in die verskillende vakke.

Die vraag ontstaan: as daar dan ‘n gereformeerde skool is waar die vakinhoud gebou is op die Woord van God, kom ons as ouers ons doopbelofte na as ons nie ons kinders in hierdie skool plaas nie, maar eerder in ‘n skool waar die vakinhoud op nie-Christelike beginsels gebou is? Dit is ‘n vraag wat elke ouerpaar vir hulleself voor die Here moet uitmaak. Dit is ook ‘n vraag waaraan Kerkrade kan aandag gee - KO Art 21 sê juis “Die kerkrade moet toesien dat die ouers die skoolonderrig aan hulle kinders in die vrees van die Here laat geskied.”

DV in ons volgende artikel beoog ons om dan aandag te gee aan die verhouding tussen die gesin, die skool, en die kerk, en hoe hierdie elemente saam ‘n driehoek vorm in die opvoeding van die verbondskinders.


Wednesday, July 21, 2021

Gereformeerde Onderwys - Hoekom?

Ons leef in 'n tyd waar die aanslag op die Christenfamilie baie groot is. Die wêreld is besig om die Bybelse siening van die die huwelik en die gesin af te breek tot 'n meer inklusiewe en vrysinnig lewenstyl. Christene word orals, en veral in skole, stelselmatig geïndoktrineer met "Babilon" se ideologieë aangaande seksualiteit, die huwelik, en die gesin. Hierteenoor staan verbondsouers se verantwoordelikheid om hul kinders op te voed in die weë van die HERE. Die vraag is nou, "hoe doen ons dit vandag?"

Die onderstaande artikel, geskryf deur die Gereformeerde Laerskool in Bellville, bied 'n oplossing vir Christenouers om hul kinders die nodige opvoeding te gee, terwyl hulle ook toegerus word met 'n Christelike wêreldbeeld wat hulle in staat stel om eendag as gelowiges te leef in 'n sondige wêreld.

Die artikel is deel van 'n reeks. Teken in op die blog om die opvolgartikels in jou inboks te kry.

Christelike waardes vs gereformeerde skool

Daar is vandag baie keuses vir ouers wat betref hulle kinders se skoolopleiding. Die dae dat die kind na die naaste skool toe gaan is lankal verby. Baie skole adverteer ook vandag dat hulle “na Christelike waardes streef” of “op Christelike waardes gebou is”. Daar is egter ander skole wat duidelik sê dat hulle gereformeerde skole is. Die vraag is dan of daar ‘n verskil is, en, indien wel, of die verskil belangrik is.

Doopbelofte

Wanneer ‘n ouerpaar hulle verbondskindjie laat doop, belowe hulle, en neem hulle hulle voor om daardie kind wanneer die kind dit kan verstaan in “die genoemde leer na (hulle) vermoë te onderrig en te laat onderrig”. Hierdie belofte teenoor die Here word voor die gemeente afgelê. Die belofte is ook op die Skrif gegrond – in Deut. 6:6-7 beveel die Here: “Hierdie gebooie wat ek jou vandag gegee het, moet in jou gedagtes bly. Jy moet dit inskerp by jou kinders en met hulle daaroor praat as jy in jou huis is en as jy op pad is, as jy gaan slaap en as jy opstaan.” Die opdrag is duidelik – ons moet die leer nie net aan ons kinders oordra op Sondag, of by katkisasie of huisgodsdiens nie, dit moet gebeur in alles wat ons doen, want die Here is betrokke by alle aspekte van ons lewe.

Wat is hierdie leer wat ouers dan belowe om hulle kinders in op te voed? Die tweede vraag tydens die doop, is soos volg: “Bely u dat die leer van die Ou en Nuwe Testament, wat in die Artikels van die Christelike geloof saamgevat is en in die Christelike kerk hier geleer word, die ware en volkome leer van die saligheid is?” As ons dan belowe om ons kinders in die Christelike leer te onderrig en te laat onderrig, belowe ons om dit te doen ooreenkomstig die Bybel, soos saamgevat en verduidelik in die Belydenisskrifte.

Leer en lewe

Uit die Skrif is dit ook duidelik dat leer en lewe onlosmaaklik deel is van mekaar. Die gebooie van die Here help niks as dit net in ons gedagtes bly nie, ons moet dit leef en nakom – sien bv Deut. 6:3. So ook, kom dit duidelik na vore in die Nuwe Testament. Titus 2 & 3 wys baie mooi hoe die gesonde leer in dade omgesit moet word.

In 1 Tim. 3:16-17 sê die Here vir ons “Die hele skrif is deur God geïnspireer en het groot waarde om in die waarheid te onderrig, dwaling te bestry, verkeerdhede reg te stel en ‘n regte lewenswyse te kweek, sodat die man wat in diens van God staan, volkome voorberei en toegerus sal wees vir elke goeie werk”. Die leer in die Skrif berei ons voor vir ons goeie werke – werke uit ‘n ware geloof, volgens die wet van God, wat tot Sy eer gedoen word (Heidelbergse Kategismus, Vraag en Antwoord 91). Soos ons in Jakobus 2:14-26 leer, ons geloof kom na vore in ons dade.

Ons lewe, bestaande uit die dade vanuit ons geloof, begin egter nie eers die dag as ons volwasse word, of as ons belydenis van geloof afgelê het nie. Ook kinders moet ooreenkomstig die Here se wet lewe, dink bv aan die vyfde gebod, en die opdrag in Ef. 6:1-3. As ons dus ons kinders in die geloof moet opvoed, sluit dit in dat ons hulle moet leer hoe die Here betrokke is in elke deeltjie van ons lewe, soos mooi geïllustreer word in Ps. 139 en in die boek Jona. Hulle moet leer dat ons nie net die Here dien op ‘n Sondag of dat Hy geen deel het aan bv geskiedenis nie. Die Here hou die geskiedenis in Sy hand, ook die geskiedenis van volke (sien bv Dan. 2).

Gereformeerde leer raak alle vlakke van ons lewe

Daarom is gereformeerde onderwys dan ook belangrik. Gereformeerde onderwys het ten doel om die Here se rol in alle vakrigtings aan te dui, want die Here is Here van ons hele lewe. Of die kind op skool dus besig is met tale, wiskunde, geskiedenis of tegnologie, die betrokkenheid van die Here op elkeen van hierdie terreine moet aangedui word. By gebreke daarvan word die volle leer van die Ou en Nuwe
Testament, soos saamgevat in die Belydenisskrifte, nie aan die kind geleer nie. Dan word die idee verskerp van ‘n skeiding tussen die “geestelike lewe, die kerk” en die algemene lewe van elke dag – ‘n onderskeid wat ons nie in die Skrif kry nie.

Dit behoort daarom duidelik te wees dat dit nie bloot genoeg is om een maal ‘n dag ‘n stukkie (meestal net ‘n versie of twee) te lees en dan te bid nie, soos wat by baie sogenaamde Christelike skole die geval is nie. Nog minder is sogenaamde Christelike waardes op hul eie voldoende, want baie van hierdie waardes, bv eerlikheid en omgee vir ander, sien ons in die meeste gelowe. Nee, die Here se betrokkenheid in alle vakke, van die tale (want dit is Hy wat tale gegee het, sien Gen. 11), deur sosiale wetenskappe (want die Here gee verskillende volke en nasies, Ps. 2, en Hy het die heelal geskep, sien Ps. 8) tot die bestuurswetenskappe (want die Here het ‘n sê oor hoe ons besigheid doen, sien bv Spr. 20:23 en Ef. 6:5-9) moet geleer word. Ons taak is om dit vir ons kinders te leer, sodat hulle as hulle eendag volwasse is, die Here se heerskappy in al die fasette van hulle lewe kan raaksien en dienooreenkomstig kan lewe.

Gereformeerde onderwys, waar die heerskappy en betrokkenheid van die Here op alle lewensterreine duidelik gemaak en uitgeleef word, is dus by uitstek die manier waarop ons kinders onderrig kan word in die leer van die Skrif.

Gereformeerde skole

Ons is bevoorreg dat daar gereformeerde skole op verskeie plekke in ons land is. Voorbeelde sluit in Gereformeerde Laerskool Bellville in Kaapstad, Gereformeerde Skool Wolmaransstad, en dan Gereformeerde Laerskool Johannes Calvyn en Gereformeerde Skool Dirk Postma (wat ‘n kleuter-, laer- en hoërskool bevat), beide in Pretoria. Hierdie, en ander soortgelyke skole, kan gerus ondersteun word. Is daar ‘n beter manier vir ‘n ouerpaar om hulle doopbelofte uit te leef, as daar ‘n gereformeerde skool binne bereik is waar hulle kinders opgevoed kan word?

Dv in ’n volgende artikel beoog ons om aandag te gee aan ‘n verdere belangrike aspek van gereformeerde onderwys, naamlik die kweek van ‘n Christelike wêreldbeskouing, waar God die middelpunt vorm, en sy Hand in alles raakgesien kan word.

Thursday, March 4, 2021

Bybelstudie in die Noordelike Voorstede van Kaapstad

'n Groep vriende in ons kerk (VGK Bellville) is tans besig met 'n studie deur die boek Romeine. Die Bybelstudie dien as 'n dissipleskap en evangelisasie instrument vir ons gemeente. Ons nooi mense uit om dit by te woon tydnes ons straatevangelisasie. Dit is oop vir enige iemand; inteendeel, ons wil graag daardeur nuwe vriende maak en Christene bemoedig en aanmoedig in die stryd in die wêreld. Jy is dus welkom om hierby aan te sluit. WhatsApp my by 066 111 5444 om meer inligting te kry.

Terug na die Bybelstudie. Daarom het ek gedink dit sal 'n goeie idee wees om die notas van ons Bybelstudie ook op my blog te plaas sodat ander baat daarby kan vind. Dalk kan dit jou ook aanmoedig om dit met ander te deel of dalk self by ons aan te sluit. Sluit dus aan by die blog om gereeld die Bybelstudiemateriaal en ander artikels te ontvang.

Ons ontmoet Donderdae om 19h30. Deel die gerus met jou vriende wat in die Kaap woon en na 'n geestlelike tuiste soek in die deurmekaar tye waarin ons leef. Jy kan ook ons webtuiste besoek vir meer inligting: https://solafive.co.za/


Ons sal baie graag van jou wil hoor. As jy enige vrae het, kontak ons of woon ons Bybelstudie by:


Donderdae @19h30,
22 Geneva Singel, Uitzicht, Durbanville.
Tel: +27 (82) 990 2359 (Jaco de Beer)
Epos: dbeerj@gmail.com
www.SolaFive.co.za

Friday, January 22, 2021

How should Christians think about church-lockdown during the covid pandemic?

Written by a friend, published with permission.

In March 2020 we were introduced to the idea of lockdown for the first time. There was great uncertainty about the dangers of the coronavirus. Throughout the world, fear and panic resulted in people being ordered to stay at home to prevent the initial spread of the virus. In South Africa, lockdown was meant to be only 3 weeks in order to prepare healthcare systems for an inevitable increase in hospital admissions.

One thing which was clear even then is that in the long run, we will have to learn how to live with this virus. Isolation is not a viable option for humanity and has shown to be just as dangerous and damaging to health as the virus itself. We were made in God’s image, body and soul, we require physical and spiritual food in order to live and thrive as human beings. We cannot shut down all of life just because there is a chance of infection and an even smaller chance of death for those who are infected (especially if they are healthy and not older than 60).

Despite these realities, at the end of December 2020 our country has once again been placed in a lockdown. Citizens have been prohibited from gathering together for worship and may only leave their homes for business purposes (which are deemed essential). Current government legislation also prohibits us from meeting with family or friends.

In light of these restrictions, we would like to provide some clarity regarding the Biblical principles that ought to guide our decision making in the months ahead. We would also like to explain why the church council has determined to continue holding worship services and what our expectation is from church members.

God’s commandments to us

1. The greatest commandment is that we must love the LORD with all our heart, soul, mind and strength (Matthew 22:37-38). The second is like it, we must love our neighbour as ourselves (Matthew 22:39-40). What this love for God and for our neighbour looks like in practice is made clear in the 10 Commandments. Indeed, in the words of Jesus Christ, we love God when we obey his commandments (John 14:15).

2. In the 4th Commandment, God requires that we gather together for worship on the Lord’s Day (Exodus 20:8-11; Heidelberg Catechism Lord’s Day 38). When gathering for worship, we do not do so primarily in order to enjoy fellowship with other believers, but to meet with God. Christ is present in the worship service in a special way (1 Corinthians 5:4; 14:25). The Holy Spirit has promised to use this means of grace to work and strengthen faith in the hearts of God’s people (CD 3/4 Article 17).

We must continue to meet together if we are to persevere and be encouraged in the Christian life (Hebrews 10:24-25). Just as we need bread and water in order to sustain our physical bodies, we also need to sit under the preaching of God’s Word (and make use of the sacraments) to nourish and sustain our faith. Gathering for worship is not optional for the Christian. It is central to our calling and will be so for eternity (Psalm 100; 1 Peter 2:9; Revelation 7:9-12). 

3. We believe that God has ordained civil officers to govern this world and that we are to be subject to them in all matters which are not in conflict with the Word of God (Acts 4:19, 5:29). This ties in with the 5th Commandment. Government authorities have the task of promoting justice and ensuring freedom of religion (Belgic Confession Article 36). In their attempts to punish evil and protect those who do good, the government has been given the power of the sword (Romans 13:4). This power does not mean that they have the authority to prohibit what God demands, or command what God prohibits.

4. It is our duty to love our neighbour and act in a manner that does not unnecessarily endanger human life (Exodus 20:13; Heidelberg Catechism Lord’s Day 40). This does not mean that we must preserve human life at all costs, as if the preservation of life is the ultimate principle that underlies all other commandments. There are times when obedience to God may result in the loss of life (e.g. Mark 8:34-48; Hebrews 11:32-40). Indeed, the expectation of New Testament Christians was that their lives would involve a lot of suffering as a result of their desire to honour God (2 Timothy 3:12).

In our ordinary day to day lives as human beings we are also constantly in situations where we take risks for those things, we consider to be important. For example, we drive to work in our cars even though there are a lot of people who die in car accidents. The risk of death does not stop us from visiting friends or going on holiday. Travel by car will always be dangerous but we do not consider such behaviour to be contrary to the 6th commandment. 

5. It might appear as if our current situation is one in which obedience to the 4th commandment (gathering for worship) is in conflict with obedience to the 5th commandment (government regulation) and the 6th commandment (preservation of life). This is not true, however. There is a way of honouring God which does not require us to break any of his commandments:

  • When governing authorities ask us to ignore any one of God’s commandments (e.g. prohibitions on gathering for worship) they are overstepping their authority and they do not have to be obeyed. The 5th commandment does not require obedience to governing authorities when they ask us to do something which God prohibits or prevent us from doing something that God demands. Gathering for worship is thus not (and can never be) in conflict with the 5th commandment.
  • Likewise, the command to preserve human life does not require us to stop meeting for worship. It is possible to worship together in a manner that is responsible. The church council has the responsibility of making sure that worship services are conducted in a way that does not unnecessarily endanger life. The only time in the Bible when people were not allowed to join worship services is if they themselves were clearly showing signs of illness (e.g. Leviticus 13). It is not unloving to gather for worship when you are healthy.

Some answers to questions regarding worship in our current circumstances

How will we ensure that worship services are safe?

There remains uncertainty regarding the transmission and spread of the coronavirus. Government health and safety protocols have been established to ensure that life may continue in a way that minimises the risk of transmission. In particular there is an emphasis on washing hands, wearing masks and maintaining appropriate social distance. We will be adhering to all these protocols in our gatherings.

In addition, we also want to make sure that we can use a building which is large enough to provide ample space for distancing. We are currently in contact with other churches in this regard. If you know of any locations that can be used to hold a worship service, please let us know.

Also, if you think that our gatherings are not as safe as you would like them to be, please do not remain silent and stay away. You are part of the body, and we need your gifts. Be part of the solution. Come with suggestions and with practical help

 

Are worship services not ‘super-spreader’ events?

The use of the term ‘super-spreader’ is often associated with activities that the government considers to be unnecessary. Thus, worship services are labelled as ‘super-spreader’ events (as are funerals), but not journeys in a taxi (where you sit next to a person in an enclosed space) or visits to the gym. We are able to maintain social distancing at worship services in a manner that is not possible in a taxi, restaurant or even at the grocery store. 

If you are convinced that the risk of loss of life should prevent us from meeting for worship, no matter what health and safety precautions are taken, then we would expect you to be consistent in your conviction. We would expect you to stay away from family visits, restaurants, business meetings, and all activities which are not absolutely essential to preserving (biological) life.


How will we ensure that worship services are not broken up by government officials?

Ideally, we would meet together in an area where it will not be obvious that there is a gathering of people. If cars can be parked in a way that they are hidden from street view, then that will prevent any unwanted visits from police. Alternatively, if we meet in a business premise, then the presence of cars outside will not be considered strange and thus won’t warrant further investigation.

We do not intend to tell lies to anyone who asks us about our gatherings, or to disguise our meetings to look like something else. We only want to avoid drawing attention, as far as possible. Consequently, we will also not publicly advertise the location of our meeting place. Only church members and visitors with whom we have personal contact will be informed of where we are meeting for worship.

 

What will happen if the police come to our worship service?

Regulation 36 (18) of the latest Level 3 lockdown rules states as follows:

An enforcement officer must. where a gathering in contravention of the regulations takes place -

(a) order the persons at the gathering to disperse immediately:

(b) if the persons refuse to disperse. take appropriate action, which may, subject to the Criminal Procedure Act, 1977 (Act No 51 of 1977), include the arrest and detention of any person at the gathering.

According to this regulation, you will not be fined or arrested if government officials should arrive. They will break up the meeting and we will go home.

 

Who will be expected to come to worship services?

God’s people delight to obey God’s commandments and worship the LORD together (Psalm 122). Except for the sick (Leviticus 13), all church members should be encouraged to be present on the Lord’s Day for worship since this is what God expects from his people (Heidelberg Catechism Lord’s Day 38). Indeed, we even confess that God has given deacons to his church with the task of ensuring that “no person is absent and/or estranged from the body of Christ on account of poverty, sickness or age.”

If you are ill or showing symptoms associated with COVID-19, please do not come to our worship services. Those who are obviously sick and thus a risk to others should not be present. However, if you are not ill or showing any symptoms, you can join us for worship. It does not matter where you work or how many people you come into contact with on a week-to-week basis. If you are healthy you can be present. 

 

What about the danger of sickness?

We understand that there are members in our church who are frail of health and very concerned about possibly contracting the virus. You may feel that our health and safety precautions are not sufficient to.

If you are someone in this category, we would encourage you to speak to us about what we can do to improve safety at our worship services so that it will be possible for you to join us. There are lots of plans that can be made.

If you are already suffering from an underlying illness which would put you or family members at great risk, we will understand if you choose to stay away from worship for a time. Again, we will expect you to be consistent and follow a course of complete self-isolation. Please also let us know how we can best minister to you during this time of isolation.    

 

What if I consider worship meetings to be sinful in our current circumstances?

Whatever we think of our government’s decision to prohibit Christians from gathering for worship, we should understand that the proclamation of the gospel is not a priority for the government. Worship gatherings are seen to have social and cultural value, but they are not seen as essential. Thus, there is a fundamental difference between how the government views worship gatherings, and how we as Christians view worship gatherings.

We realise that there are some Christian believers who are convinced that it would be sinful and wrong to keep meeting for worship. We disagree with this conclusion and would encourage you to please write a letter explaining where we have faulted in our reasoning or misunderstood God’s commandments.

We would also like to draw attention to the fact that any and all social gatherings are currently prohibited by the government. Thus, if it is wrong to meet for worship, it is also wrong to meet with members of your family or friends who are not living with you. Whether you meet at the restaurant or in your home does not affect the legality of doing so. Again, we would expect you to be consistent.

 

There are many religious groups who will not be adhering to appropriate health and safety protocols. Surely, we can understand why a blanket ban on religious gatherings is necessary in current circumstances?

The government has not banned all restaurants from opening for business even though there are some which do not follow safety protocols. The government does not ban all cars because some people are irresponsible drivers. Having been given the task to promote justice, the government must distinguish between good and bad (Romans 13:3). They must distinguish between those who act responsibly and those who do not, punishing wrongdoers and not being a terror to those who do good.


What about the recommendations from the RCSA Deputies?

The RCSA Deputies responsible for engaging in discussion with our government are of the opinion that it would be wrong for churches to continue meeting for worship. They believe that the government has the authority to prevent the church from gathering on the Lord’s Day, even though this is a clear Biblical command.

In response, there are several things to mention:

1. The deputies do not speak for all the churches in the RCSA. Their opinion is not an official decision which the RCSA has made. Their opinion serves as a recommendation. There are a number of churches in the RCSA who are speaking to the deputies and sharing their disagreements with them. There are also a number of churches who are proceeding with worship services.

2. The deputies consider that preservation of life requires self-isolation and that this means abstaining from worship services. This is inconsistent with the belief (which all RCSA churches confess) that gathering for worship is essential and necessary for the Christian believer. 

3. The deputies think that a message which is broadcast over the internet is a sufficient means of proclaiming the gospel in our time and circumstances. Though we can agree with them that Bible truths can be communicated in this manner, we do not think that this can replace a worship service, nor excuse us from gathering together.

In addition, online video messages are only possible for rich churches and ministries in areas where people have easy access to the internet. In poor areas of our country, the prohibition on worship is preventing the gospel from being shared. There can be no house-to-house visits - even street evangelism is prohibited since you may not leave your home for anything except exercise and commerce.

4. The deputies argue that, since the reason for the prohibition of worship is honourable, the prohibition must be seen as legitimate. This argument seems persuasive until one considers that governments around the world regularly use ‘honourable’ motivations for ungodly decisions. For example, abortion is allowed in the interests of ‘women’s health.’ The ends do not justify the means (Romans 3:7-8). A sincere motivation does not justify disobedience to God.

5. The deputies argue that, since the government has the responsibility of protecting the lives of its citizens, we should be obedient to their attempts to do so. This is true unless the government prohibits us from doing what God has commanded or requires us to do what God has prohibited.

6. The deputies argue that, since the prohibitions on worship are not motivated by a desire to persecute Christians, they must be adhered to. Only when Christians are being persecuted for their faith do they have the right to disobedience. This argument has already been addressed above (4), however it also prompts the question: When does persecution begin? The Israelites in Egypt were persecuted not for their faith, but for the political threat that they seemed to hold for the Egyptians. Christians living in the early church were persecuted by authorities not for believing in Jesus Christ, but for their failure to go along with the Romans’ idolatrous customs. They were thus being persecuted because they sought to obey God rather than men.


 A last word

The first readers of the book of Hebrews faced persecution and pressure in many forms. The writer of Hebrews commanded them: ‘Let us consider how to stir up one another to love and good works, not neglecting to meet together, as is the habit of some, but encouraging one another, and all the more as you see the Day drawing nearer’ (Hebrews 10:24-25).

We see the Day (the day of Christ’s second coming) drawing nearer. We see it in the form of pestilences, other illnesses, natural disasters, economic crises, famines and political turmoil. Some of our members have been touched by these things in a very personal way.

As we see the Day drawing nearer, we have all the more reason to gather together. All the more, we should come together in prayer for each other and for the world. All the more, we should encourage one another to live by faith, and not by fear.

Freedom of Religion South Africa (FOR SA) to challenge the current Lockdown regulations in court

Freedom of Religion South Africa (FOR SA) – on behalf of various churches and faith groups in South Africa – intends to intervene in (and ask that our application be heard simultaneously with) the South African National Christian Forum’s (SANCF) application to the Johannesburg High Court to challenge the current Lockdown regulations which prohibit all faith-based gatherings indefinitely. This application will likely be heard in early February.

FOR SA has previously written to the President to ask that Government provide the scientific data and reasons why it has banned all faith-based gatherings during the adjusted Level 3 regulations, while allowing for (e.g.) casinos, fitness clubs, cinemas, conference centres, galleries, museums and restaurants to continue operating subject to certain numerical limitations and safety protocols. We believe that this blanket ban is irrational and unconstitutional, because it discriminates unfairly against the religious sector.

FOR SA respects Government’s right to promulgate regulations to safeguard lives and to prevent the health care system from being overwhelmed. Our argument simply is that it must treat all sectors of society equally, unless it can provide scientific evidence that faith-based gatherings (which at this point remain undefined) pose a greater health risk than those gatherings it permits.

While there are diverse opinions within the religious sector regarding the motivations for, or appropriate response, to Government’s blanket ban on all forms of religious meetings, FOR SA’s position is that the question is ultimately a legal one – Is Government’s blanket ban on religious meetings reasonable and justifiable in terms of section 36 of the Constitution (which includes that it must be based on scientific data).

As a legal advocacy group working to protect and promote the constitutional rights of all faiths to freedom of religion, FOR SA has no desire to be contentious or adversarial towards Government. Given, however, that the religious community has greater constitutional protection than any economic sector of our society, we have no option other than to prepare a legal challenge, while at the same time hoping that Government will either amend its position or provide scientific and data-backed reasons for its unfair treatment of the religious community. In the absence of this, we believe that this decision by Government should be tested in a court of law and that a judicial review is important to evaluate and fairly assess whether (or not) Government’s severe restriction of these fundamental rights is reasonable and justifiable in accordance with the requirements of the rule of law, the Constitution and just administrative action.

FOR SA’s arguments, and the relief it seeks, are very similar to cases recently adjudicated in Germany, Switzerland, France and the USA, where courts have struck down regulations which have unfairly discriminated against faith-based gatherings and places of worship. As such, our application challenging the blanket ban on religious gatherings – if successful – will benefit all religious institutions and persons from across the faith spectrum who are currently unable to gather in any shape or form.

A copy of the Executive Summary setting out the proposed grounds for FOR SA’s court application, and the proposed relief we would be asking the Court for can be viewed here.

FOR SA encourages all interested religious organisations to consider if/how you would like to become involved in this matter. To this end, we have prepared a Form/Survey with further information, which can securely and easily be completed on-line. Should further information be required, please contact Michael Swain, Executive Director of FOR SA on 072 270 1217 or email michael.swain@forsa.org.za.